it should be a way of monitoring the government.” The outbreak of the epidemic in Taiwan since May has greatly increased the above-mentioned distrust of the government. Especially during the period of vaccine shortage, there is disagreement on non-manageriality. The people's emotionally urgent expectations for vaccines are real and real. Emotional reactions, such emotional ups and downs, also provided favorable soil for the Kuomintang to operate the four referendum cases. These voters, who are inherently skeptical of the government and tend to stand against the government, may decide the success or failure of the referendum. In
order to win the support of this group of voters, overemphasizing "anti-China protection of Taiwan" will only have the opposite effect, because these people may actually agree that Taiwan should be pro-US and anti-China, but they will only talk about "anti-China" when it comes to whatever the government encounters. China Security Council," would think that this sms services is just an excuse for the government to not want to be scrutinized by the people. At this time, what the DPP government should do is to positively acknowledge the people's sentiments that they want to supervise the government and assume the responsibility that the government should be supervised, but try to let the people know that the
four referendums are not just for the people to compare their middle fingers to the government. Emotional outlet that will be fine after finishing, but self-mutilation behavior that will specifically harm people's own interests. The Kuomintang went to the Central Election Conference to submit a joint signature letter to the anti-Lai pig referendum (1) Photo Credit: WebMD Make it clear that after the referendum was passed, "the negative effects that the Kuomintang did not talk about", not just "the middle finger to the government" One of the ways to highlight the harm of the referendum to the people's self-interest is to rename the four referendums when communicating with the people, and directly use the negative results of the referendum as the language when discussing the referendum case: First of all, the